Words, Bitter Meanings: A Pragmatic Study of Implicature in Melanie Martinez’s Gingerbread Man
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58712/se.v1i2.119Keywords:
conversational implicature, Gricean maxims, figurative language, song lyrics, Melanie MartinezAbstract
This study provides a pragmatic analysis of conversational implicature in Melanie Martinez’s song Gingerbread Man, focusing on how meaning is constructed beyond literal interpretation through linguistic choices. Each lyrical line was examined using Grice’s theory of implicature to determine how the four cooperative maxims, including Quantity, Quality, Relation, and Manner, are adhered to, violated, or intentionally flouted. The analysis reveals that flouting predominantly occurs in the maxims of Manner, Quality, and Quantity, indicating intentional ambiguity, exaggeration, and symbolic indirection throughout the lyrics. Such patterns demonstrate Martinez’s creative strategy of using metaphor, sensual imagery, and emotionally charged symbolism to communicate deeper messages surrounding desire, vulnerability, power imbalance, and nontraditional perceptions of romantic relationships. These findings highlight implicature as a poetic mechanism that enriches the narrative, enabling multilayered interpretation and emotional resonance beyond explicit meaning. The study further emphasizes the value of pragmatic theory in analyzing artistic texts, showing how linguistic inference uncovers nuanced meaning embedded in contemporary music. This research contributes to the growing intersection between linguistics and literary discourse and encourages future studies to explore implicature in Martinez’s broader body of work or compare multiple musical genres to better understand how artists employ pragmatic devices to express identity, social messages, and psychological complexity.
Downloads
References
Alek. (2018). Linguistik umum [General linguistics] (N. I. Sallama, Ed.). Penerbit Erlangga.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R., & Nash, W. (1990). Seeing through language: A guide to styles of English writing. Blackwell.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitavie, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Edition). SAGE Publications.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.
https://archive.org/details/studiesinwayofwoOOgric
Griffiths, P. (2006). An introduction to English semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh University Press.
Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Leech, G. (2008). Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. Routledge.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Machin, D. (2010). Analysing popular music: Image, sound, and text. SAGE Publications.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Sinha, K. K. (2021). The role of pragmatics in literary analysis: Approaching literary meaning from a linguistic perspective. International Journal of English and Comparative Literary Studies, 2(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.47631/ijecls.v2i2.211
Thomas, J. (2013). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Routledge.
Toolan, M. (1998). Language in literature: An introduction to stylistics. Hodder Arnold.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suci Pole Mappaita, Fadillah Pole Mappaita, Bayan Okenova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

STKIP PESISIR SELATAN 




















