Behind the words: Exploring speech acts in “The Aesop for Children”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58712/se.v1i1.1Keywords:
speech acts, fable, children’s reading activity, linguisticsAbstract
This study analyzed speech acts in selected fables from the website “The Aesop for Children” to explore how utterances convey meaning and moral values. Utilizing the speech act theories of John L. Austin and John R. Searle, the research examined locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts within four fables: “The Gnat and The Bull”, “The Plane Tree”, “The Fox and The Goat”, and “The Cock and The Fox”. The findings reveal that most speech acts are directive, emphasizing the influence of utterances on the interlocutors. The moral lessons derived from these fables highlight the importance of humility, gratitude, caution, and the consequences of deception. This research underscores the significance of understanding speech acts in children’s literature, providing insights for parents and educators in guiding children’s reading experiences. Future studies could expand the scope by analyzing a larger corpus of fables from diverse cultural backgrounds to compare how speech acts function across different storytelling traditions. Incorporating multimodal elements such as illustrations and audio-visual adaptations could also offer deeper insights into how various modes of communication contribute to meaning-making and ethical development in children’s literature.
Downloads
References
Altikriti, S. F. (2011). Speech Act Analysis to Short Stories. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1374-1384
Amalia, F., Hidayat, D. N., & Alek, A. (2021). Illocutionary Speech Acts Analysis in Nadhira Afifa’s Speech as A Student Speaker at Harvard Graduation 2020. Aksis?: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.21009/AKSIS.050106
Aram, D., & Yashar, R. (2023). Parents’ understanding of early writing development and ways to promote it: Relations with their own children’s early writing. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1044907
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Babazade, Y. (2025). Speech Acts and Hidden Meaning: A Journey into Pragmatics. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.02500128
Benabbes, S., & AbdulHaleem Abu Taleb, H. (2024). The effect of storytelling on the development of language and social skills in French as a foreign language classrooms. Heliyon, 10(8), e29178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29178
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse A Resource book students . Routledge.
De Felice, S., Hamilton, A. F. de C., Ponari, M., & Vigliocco, G. (2023). Learning from others is good, with others is better: the role of social interaction in human acquisition of new knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 378(1870). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0357
Hanna, N., & Richards, D. (2019). Speech Act Theory as an Evaluation Tool for Human–Agent Communication. Algorithms, 12(4), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/a12040079
Jegede, O. O. (2024). Speech Acts in the Digital Sphere: A Corpus-Based Exploration of Interactional Dynamics on Social Media Platforms. Corpus-Based Studies across Humanities, 2(2), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1515/csh-2024-0023
Jucker, A. H. (2024). Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009421461
Kirsch, C., & Bergeron-Morin, L. (2023). Educators, parents and children engaging in literacy activities in multiple languages: an exploratory study. International Journal of Multilingualism, 20(4), 1386–1403. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2195658
Küntay, A. C., & ?enay, ?. (2003). Narratives beget narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(4), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00129-7
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313
Litt, E., Zhao, S., Kraut, R., & Burke, M. (2020). What Are Meaningful Social Interactions in Today’s Media Landscape? A Cross-Cultural Survey. Social Media + Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120942888
Mey, J. L. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Blackwell Publihsing.
Ögel-Balaban, H., & Aksu-Koç, A. (2020). Clause Chaining and Discourse Continuity in Turkish Children’s Narratives. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00115
Pelletier, D., Guay, F., & Falardeau, É. (2024). Contributions of Reading Support from Teachers, Parents, and Friends to Reading Related Variables in Academic and Recreational Contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.538
Rahayu, P., & Eripuddin, E. (2023). The Illocutionary Speech Acts in Students’ Public Speaking. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 834–844. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.3158
van Ruler, B. (2018). Communication Theory: An Underrated Pillar on Which Strategic Communication Rests. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1452240
Wallwey, C., & Kajfez, R. L. (2023). Quantitative research artifacts as qualitative data collection techniques in a mixed methods research study. Methods in Psychology, 8, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2023.100115
Yule, G. (2019). The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108582889
STKIP PESISIR SELATAN 
